Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Wells Fargo Bank v. Dax

New Mexico Court of Appeals

Decided December 6, 1979No. 4116Published

1ConcurrenceSutin, Judge

(specially concurring).

I concur in the result.

Notice of date and time of a trial hearing is a matter of grave concern to parties in litigation. To deny a hearing on the merits without good reason defies what we commonly refer to as justice and fair play. This case is one of first impression, one that requires circumspection in dealing with a rule which requires district courts to place an action upon the trial calendar.

Rule 18(c)(6) of the Rules of the Second Judicial District reads:

Requests for settings for trial alone may be sent directly to the assigned Judge who will make the setting. The…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Mansfield State Bank v. CohnTexas Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Plains Growers, Inc. v. JordanTexas Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Ed Martin Ford Co., Inc. v. MartinIndiana Court of Appeals · 1977
  4. Knight v. DavisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1978
  5. Ries Flooring Co. v. Dileno Construction Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1977

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API