Legal Opinion

Burr v. Pennsylvania Railroad

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided November 13, 1899PublishedCited by 12 opinions

On rule to show cause.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Van Syckel, J.

This action was brought to recover compensation for injuries sustained by the plaintiff, while a passenger on a train of the defendant company, by being thrown down, as is alleged, by the motion of the train in starting from the station at Barnegat pier, while she was in the act of changing her seat from one side of the car to the other for the purpose of looking out of the window.

In the trial court the plaintiff recovered a verdict for .$7,208.

A rule to show cause was granted why the verdict should not be set aside.

The reasons relied…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Consolidated Traction Co. v. ThalheimerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1896
  2. Barden v. Boston, Clinton & Fitchburg RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1877

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Sever v. Minneapolis & St. Louis Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1912
  2. Fitch v. Mason City & Clear Lake Traction Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1904
  3. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. v. HibbsSupreme Court of Virginia · 1925
  4. Norfolk & Western Railway Co. v. RhodesSupreme Court of Virginia · 1909
  5. St. Louis S. F. R. Co. v. FittsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API