Legal Opinion

Atlas Supply Co. v. Commissioner

United States Board of Tax Appeals

Decided January 15, 1941No. Docket No. 101323Published

For the purposes of the credit provided by section 26(c)(1) of the Revenue Act of 1936, a corporate bylaw, as such, is not a "written contract executed by the corporation." Davision-Joseph Campau Realty Co.,41 B.T.A. 675, followed.

1Opinion of the Court

ATLAS SUPPLY COMPANY, PETITIONER, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT.

Atlas Supply Co. v. Commissioner

Docket No. 101323.

United States Board of Tax Appeals

43 B.T.A. 324; 1941 BTA LEXIS 1515;

January 15, 1941, Promulgated

For the purposes of the credit provided by section 26(c)(1) of the Revenue Act of 1936, a corporate bylaw, as such, is not a "written contract executed by the corporation." Davision-Joseph Campau Realty Co.,41 B.T.A. 675, followed.

Frederick L. Pearce, Esq., for the petitioner.

Chester A. Gwinn, Esq., and L. W. Creason, Esq., for the erspondent.

LEECH

This is a…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Atlas Supply Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1941
  2. Davison-Joseph Campau Realty Co. v. Commissioner (A)United States Board of Tax Appeals · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API