Legal Opinion

GOLDEN MEADOWS PROPERTIES, LC v. Strand

Court of Appeals of Utah

Decided December 8, 2011No. 20110839-CAPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION

2Per curiam

1 Michael Strand and Cari Allen (Appellants) appeal the district court's September 2, 2011 order denying their rule 59 motion for a new trial. The rule 59 motion was filed following the district court's order denying their motion to set aside an execution sale. This matter is before the court on a sua sponte motion for summary disposition. 1 We affirm.

12 Appellants first assert that the district court erred by denying their motion to set aside an execution sale that was held on November 24, 2008. In determining whether an execution sale should be side aside, a district court should…

3Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Christenson v. JewkesUtah Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Moon Lake Electric Ass'n v. Ultrasystems Western Constructors, Inc.Court of Appeals of Utah · 1988
  3. PDQ Lube Center, Inc. v. HuberCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1997
  4. Golden Meadows Properties, LC v. StrandCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2010
  5. Bangerter v. PettyCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2010

4Cited by2 opinions

  1. ASC Utah, Inc. v. Wolf Mountain Resorts, L.C.Utah Supreme Court · 2013
  2. ASC Utah v. Wolf MountainUtah Supreme Court · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API