L. M. White Contracting Co. v. Tucson Rock & Sand Co.
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
HATHAWAY, Judge.
This litigation between Tucson Rock and Sand Company as plaintiff and L. M. White Contracting Company as defendant arose out of the latter’s refusal to permit the plaintiff to enter upon land owned by the defendant and to remove sand and gravel therefrom. The case was tried to the court sitting without a jury and extensive findings of fact and conclusions of law were rendered. The issues as to plaintiff’s right to enter and remove gravel were resolved in its favor, hence this appeal. The trial court, however, denied plaintiff’s claim for damages for the period in which its…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Beatty v. . Guggenheim Exploration Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1919
- Connor v. Great Western Savings & Loan Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- Murillo v. HernandezArizona Supreme Court · 1955
- Gilmore v. CohenArizona Supreme Court · 1963
- King v. UhlmannArizona Supreme Court · 1968
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Fleitz v. Van WestrienenCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1977
- Estate of Hernandez v. FlavioArizona Supreme Court · 1997
- Murry v. Western American Mortgage Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1979
- Hatoff v. Lemons & Associates, Inc. (In Re Lemons & Associates, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Nevada · 1986
- Berger v. MeadMichigan Court of Appeals · 1983
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.