Legal Opinion

State v. . Graham

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided January 5, 1877Published

Jurisdiction — Indictment. INDICTMENT for stealing corn growing and remaining un-gathered iu a certain field, tried at Pall Term, 1876, of An-son Superior Court, before Furches, J. The counsel for defendant in the Court below moved to dismiss the case upon the ground that the Superior Court fiad no jurisdiction of the offence charged in the bill of indictment. His Honor overruled the motion and the defendant appealed.

1Opinion of the CourtEynum, J.

The veiy question of jurisdiction here raised, lias been expressly decided by this Court so late as the January Term, 1875. State v. Cherry, 72 N. C. 123. It was there held that the Superior Court has jurisdiction of the of-fence.

It is to be noted, that although this case has been here twice before, by appeal of the defendant, (74 N. C. 646 and 75 N. C. 256), yet this question of jurisdiction has not been raised by him before. Such a practice, to say the least, is not encouraged by the Court. It is to be further noted, that the question of iurisdiction was not made until after it had ibeen…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. . GrahamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1876
  2. State v. . CherrySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1875

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API