Legal Opinion

Kochan v. Kochan

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 9, 2011No. B215355PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BIGELOW, P. J.

Family Code section 4320 provides that the family law court “shall consider” the “earning capacity of each party” in ordering spousal support, but the decision whether to order support based on a party’s earning capacity rather than actual earnings is a matter within the court’s discretion. (See, e.g., In re Marriage of Rosen (2002) 105 Cal.App.4th 808, 825 [130 Cal.Rptr.2d 1].) In the case before us today, the family law court entered a spousal support order based in part upon a finding that a spouse with a 40-year employment history with the California State University…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. In Re Marriage of GillmoreCalifornia Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Philbin v. PhilbinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
  3. In Re Marriage of AndreenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
  4. Estate of LeslieCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984
  5. In Re Marriage of SimpsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. In re Marriage of McLainCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2017
  2. Berman v. Berman (In re Berman), California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
  3. Marriage of Blake and Langer CA2/4California Court of Appeal · 2020
  4. Marriage of Pinon CA4/2California Court of Appeal · 2015
  5. Speier v. Superior Court CA4/3California Court of Appeal · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API