Legal Opinion
United States v. RMI Co.
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Decided March 14, 1979No. Crim. A. 78-225PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SNYDER, District Judge.
In this proceeding, we are required to consider the Government’s Motion to Disqualify Counsel, including their respective law firms, from all further participation in these proceedings, or, in the alternative from further representation of three individuals, Nancy Beatty, Dorothy A. Smith, two secretaries employed by Defendant RMI Company, and Robert N. Geisinger, RMI’s Secretary-Treasurer and Comptroller, each of whom the Government states it plans to call at trial. The Government also moves for disqualification of RMI’s counsel from representing any other RMI…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Brady v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Gulf Oil Corp. v. Copp Paving Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
- United States v. Harry BernsteinCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1976
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 93,675 James M. Richardson v. Hamilton International CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1972
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Maritrans GP Inc. v. Pepper, Hamilton & ScheetzSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
- United States of America, Robin L. Harris v. Virgilio TalaoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- In Re Marine Power & Equipment Co., Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Washington · 1986
- Northwest Bypass Group v. U.S. Army Corps of EngineersDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 2007
- In Re Coordinated Pretrial Proceedings in Petroleum Products Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, C.D. California · 1980
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.