Legal Opinion

Lowe v. Blair

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1842PublishedCited by 6 opinions

ERROR to the Decatur Circuit Court. The defendants in error were the plaintiffs in the Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtDewey, J.

Debt against three defendants on a joint promissory note. As to one of the defendants, the following entry was made on the record: “ It is made known to the satisfaction of the Court, that Samuel Q. Lowe is not found. The other defendants appeared, and pleaded an agreement on the part *of the plaintiffs, not to sue on the note for twenty years from the date of the agreement, which was in 1839. The plea begins in bar, concludes in abatement, and is sworn to. The plaintiffs demurred generally as to a plea in bar; and the defendants joined in demurrer as in bar. The Court sustained the demurrer,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Berry v. BatesIndiana Supreme Court · 1828
  2. Reed v. ShawIndiana Supreme Court · 1823

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Nelson v. WhiteIndiana Supreme Court · 1878
  2. Durbin v. Northwestern Scraper Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1905
  3. Lockwood v. DillsIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  4. State ex rel. Clark, Dodge & Co. v. City of DavenportSupreme Court of Iowa · 1861
  5. Heaston v. FulghumIndiana Supreme Court · 1844

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API