Legal Opinion

Michalson v. Myrick

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided July 22, 1896PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Action by Esther Michalson against Smart Myrick, sr., Smart Myrick, jr., J. Angus Myrick, and David Myrick, for possession of real estate.

Read the full summary

Action by Esther Michalson against Smart Myrick, sr., Smart Myrick, jr., J. Angus Myrick, and David Myrick, for possession of real estate. All issues, by consent, were referred to the master, who made the following report: The master, to whom the above cause was referred to hear and determine all of the issues, both of law and fact, begs leave to report: This is an action for the recovery of real estate, the plaintiff basing her right to recover upon a deed executed by the sheriff of Barnwell County, bearing date the 4th day of February, 1895. The defendant, Smart Myrick, sr., in his answer,…

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Gary.

The following statement of facts appears in the “Case:” This action was commenced on the 14th day of February, 1895, by the service of the summons and complaint. The said complaint was in the usual form for the recovery of real estate, and alleged that the plaintiff was seized in fee of the land herein described, and that the defendants were in possession thereof, and withheld the same from the plaintiff wrongfully. The description of the land in the said complaint was the same as that mentioned and described in the sheriff’s deed…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Glenn v. RuddSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1904
  2. Bailey Sons v. WoodSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1905
  3. Bailey Sons v. WoodSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1905
  4. McCreary v. CoggeshallSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1906

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API