Snider v. Rinehart
Supreme Court of Colorado
Appeal from the District Court of El Paso County. George W. Snider, appellant, instituted this suit in the district court of El Paso county on January 5, 1893, against Charles Rinehart and Emma R. Austin, as the heirs of Rose Rinehart, deceased, to enjoin the enforcement of a judgment at law theretofore and on the 12th day of April, 1888, rendered against appellant in favor of said Rose.
Read the full summary
Appeal from the District Court of El Paso County. George W. Snider, appellant, instituted this suit in the district court of El Paso county on January 5, 1893, against Charles Rinehart and Emma R. Austin, as the heirs of Rose Rinehart, deceased, to enjoin the enforcement of a judgment at law theretofore and on the 12th day of April, 1888, rendered against appellant in favor of said Rose. The complaint is very voluminous, and among other things sets forth the history of the action at law in which the judgment was rendered, and is in brief as follows: The complaint filed in that action on or…
1DissentJustice Goddard
After a careful and thorough examination of the record presented, I am unable to concur in either the conclusion of my learned associates, or in the reasoning upon which that conclusion rests. It is of little moment, so far as the question before us is concerned, what the testimony of any individual witness was before the trial court, since that court, in the exercise of its peculiar province, has found that the weight of the testimony introduced sustained certain conclusions of fact, and, under the well settled doctrine of this court, these findings must be accepted as correct, and are not…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Cragin v. PowellSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- New York & Maryland Line R. Co. v. WinansSupreme Court of the United States · 1854
- Beardsley v. CraneSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1893
- Warren v. AdamsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1894
- George v. ThomasTexas Supreme Court · 1856
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.