Legal Opinion

John P. Dant Distillery Co. v. Schenley Distillers, Inc.

District Court, W.D. Kentucky

Decided August 9, 1960No. Civ. A. No. 3044PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SHELBOURNE, District Judge.

This action was instituted by John P-Dant Distillery Co., against Schenley Distillers, Inc., by the filing of a complaint November 21, 1955. Plaintiff invoked jurisdiction of this Court on diversity of citizenship between the plaintiff and the defendant. Plaintiff sought a declaration of rights with respect to the trade-mark under which it markets whiskey and its corporate name, and sought injunctions protecting it in the continuation of its alleged right to use the trade-mark and its corporate name.

Defendant filed its answer April 4, 1957, denying in detail the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Goodyear's India Rubber Glove Manufacturing Co. v. Goodyear Rubber Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1888
  2. L. E. Waterman Co. v. Modern Pen Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1914
  3. Anheuser-Busch, Inc. v. Du Bois Brewing Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1949
  4. Procter & Gamble Co. v. J. L. Prescott Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1939
  5. Richardson v. Blue Grass Mining Co.District Court, E.D. Kentucky · 1939

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Colston Investment Co. v. Home Supply Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 2001
  2. Crane Co. v. Crane Heating & Air Conditioning Co., a Corporation, Frank J. Crane, Jr., Thomas CraneCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1962
  3. Continente v. ContinenteDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1965
  4. John P. Dant Distillery Co. v. Schenley Distillers, Inc., and Third Party v. John P. Dant, Jr., Third PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API