Legal Opinion

Wheeler v. Metropolitan Atlanta Rapid Transit Authority

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided March 17, 2010No. A09A2206PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Barnes, Judge.

This appeal arises from a trial court’s grant of summary judgment to the Metropolitan Atlanta Rapid Transit Authority (MARTA) on Sabrina Wheeler’s complaint for personal injuries. Wheeler appeals, and for the reasons stated below, we reverse.

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c). A de novo standard of review applies to an appeal from a grant of summary judgment, and we view the evidence, and all reasonable conclusions and inferences drawn from it, in the light most…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Matjoulis v. Integon General Ins. Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1997
  2. Moore v. Goldome Credit Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1988
  3. Whitley v. Piedmont Hospital, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2007
  4. Anderson v. Sears Roebuck & Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2008
  5. Thomas v. Metropolitan Atlanta Rapid Transit AuthorityCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2009

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. MARK GUISE v. JANET BETH LEONICourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2023
  2. UNITED PARCEL SERVICE OF AMERICA, INC. v. MARTHA WHITLOCKCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2023
  3. Wheeler v. Metropolitan Atlanta Rapid Transit AuthorityCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API