Legal Opinion

COM., DEPT. OF PROFESSIONAL v. Lancaster

Court of Appeals of Virginia

Decided June 7, 2005No. Record 1868-04-1PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BENTON, JR., Judge.

The Department of Professional Regulation’s Real Estate Board imposed sanctions on real estate agents Jamie W. Lancaster and Christina L. Lancaster for three violations that occurred during their representations of Alice Mann in real estate transactions. Following the Lancasters’ appeal to the circuit court, the trial judge affirmed two of the sanctions and remanded the third sanction (Count I) to the Board for a further hearing. The Board contends the trial judge erred in remanding the proceeding for a further hearing. The Lancasters argue that the trial judge had the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Coopers & Lybrand v. LivesaySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Sullivan v. FinkelsteinSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  3. Bell v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. Jones v. WillardSupreme Court of Virginia · 1983
  5. Allen v. ParkeySupreme Court of Virginia · 1929

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Tesla, Inc. v. Virginia Automobile Dealers AssociationCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2018
  2. Arturo Barnes v. Commonwealth of VirginiaCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2024
  3. Bujno v. CommonwealthChesapeake County Circuit Court · 2013
  4. Citizen Potawatomi Nation v. .Dinwiddie Department of Social ServicesCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2013
  5. Citizen Potawatomi Nation v. Dinwiddie Department of Social ServicesCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2013

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API