Legal Opinion

O'Connor v. Enright Marble & Tile Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided October 11, 2005PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the defendants appeal (1), as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Douglass, J.), dated April 16, 2004, as granted the plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment on the issue of liability pursuant to Labor Law § 240 (1), and (2), as limited by their brief and a stipulation of the parties dated September 20, 2005, from so much of a judgment of the same court (Knipel, J.) entered February 23, 2005, as is in favor of the plaintiffs and against them on the issue of liability.

Ordered that…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. In re AhoNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
  2. Morin v. Machnick Builders, Ltd.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
  3. Brandl v. Ram Builders, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
  4. Cannata v. One Estate, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
  5. Allen v. Village of FarmingdaleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Rudnik v. Brogor Realty Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
  2. Chlebowski v. EsberAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
  3. Raynor v. Quality Plaza RealtyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API