Legal Opinion

Nahal v. Allina Health System

District Court, D. Minnesota

Decided April 17, 2019No. 0:18-cv-00631Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA ARMON NAHAL, Case No. 18-cv-631-DWF-KMM Plaintiff, PROTECTIVE ORDER v. REGARDING SUMMARY JUDGMENT SUBMISSIONS ALLINA HEALTH SYSTEM, Defendant. This matter is before the Court for the entry of a protective order concerning the electronic filing of information in connection with the defendant’s anticipated motion for summary judgment. , , 268 F.R.D. 279, 310 n.9 (E.D. Mich. 2010) (noting that district courts have the authority to enter protective orders as reflected in the language of Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(c)); , No. C07-5248 (JW/PVT), 2008 WL…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Flagg v. City of DetroitDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API