Angel L. Enriquez and Miguel Cura v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
KOELSCH, Circuit Judge.
The Federal Grand Jury returned a six count indictment against the defendants, Enriquez and Cura, charging them with violations of 21 U.S.C. § 176a (marihuana). Four of the counts (I, II, III and IV) named Enriquez alone, while the remaining two (V and VI) were directed against the defendants jointly. 1 The jury found defendants guilty as charged and the court sentenced them to serve terms of seven years’ imprisonment on each count, the sentences to run concurrently. Defendants have appealed. Briefly stated, the facts surrounding the offenses are these: 2
On the evening…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Agnello v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Krulewitch v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Logan v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Lawn v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Chester Nelson v. People of the State of California, Robert A. Heinze, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1965
- Raoul Moody v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1967
- Lennart A. Benson v. State Board of Parole & ProbationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1967
- James Lee Argo v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1967
- United States v. Daniel Dee VeonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1973
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.