Legal Opinion

Scheinberg v. Scheinberg

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided October 15, 1927PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

It is apparent as contended by the appellant that the plaintiffs have not furnished sufficient proof of the contents of the lost or withheld exhibits, and the court has failed to take proof of the contents thereof. The order should, therefore, be reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements to the appellant, with a direction to the court to take proof and make a record of the nature and contents of the exhibits, so that the record on appeal may contain the substance thereof. The case on appeal may then be ordered printed and filed. Present — Dowling, P. J., Merrell, Finch, MeAvoy and…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. MATTER OF GALIBER v. PreviteNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
  2. Shields v. Mt. Carmel Baptist ChurchAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1954

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API