Legal Opinion

Graham v. Angelone

District Court, E.D. Virginia

Decided November 10, 1999No. CIV. A. 2:97CV270PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

DOUMAR, District Judge.

Defendant’s counsel filed a Motion to Reconsider the Denial of Request for Clemency Compensation. For the reasons stated below, the Court DENIES Defendant’s Motion.

On March 27, 1997, the Court appointed counsel to represent Andre Graham. Since that date, the Court has paid appointed counsel more than $98,000 in fees and expenses for their services in preparing Defendant’s habeas petition. Appointed counsel then requested compensation for the investigation and preparation of Defendant’s clemency petition. This Court denied counsel’s request in a letter dated October…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Connecticut Board of Pardons v. DumschatSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  2. John A. Spinkellink, 1 v. Louie L. Wainwright, Secretary, Florida Department of Offender RehabilitationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
  3. Schick v. ReedSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. Otey v. StenbergCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1994

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Thomas v. CrownDistrict Court, W.D. Virginia · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API