Washington-Alaska Bank v. Dexter Horton Nat. Bank
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1DissentRoss, Circuit Judge
It is contended on behalf of the appellants, among other things, that by reason of the laws of the state of Nevada, under which the insolvent bank was incorporated, the appellee was not entitled to any payment out of the funds in the hands of the receiver until all of the depositors of the bank, as well as all holders of exchange against it, were paid in full, which full payments, it is undisputed, have never been made; the record showing the unsecured creditors to have been paid but 50 per cent, of their allowed claims.
One of the provisions of the Constitution of Nevada in force at the time…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Scott v. ArmstrongSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Merrill v. National Bank of JacksonvilleSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
- Cook County National Bank v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
- Lámar v. MicouSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
- Fourth Nat. Bank of NY v. FrancklynSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.