Legal Opinion

Brown v. Braunstein

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 1, 1903PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal by the plaintiffs, Oliver C. Brown and another, doing business under the name of “ The Bent Glass Novelty Co.,” from an order of the Supreme Court, made at the Kings County Special Term and entered in the office of the clerk of the county of Kings on the 14th day of April, 1903, denying a motion to punish the defendant Simon Braunstein as for a contempt.

1Opinion of the Court

Woodward, J. :

The plaintiffs, doing business as the Bent Glass Novelty Company, brought this action on the 19th day of January, 1903, to restrain the defendants from- using the name, “The Bent Glass Globe Manufacturing Co.,” or other name similar to that in use by the plaintiffs, and also to restrain them from using their designs, patterns, photographs, etc., as well as “ from using the numbers devised by the plaintiffs to facilitate their business with customers set forth in the complaint, or any similar numbers based on such numbers, or upon the system devised by these plaintiffs as…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Ketchum v. . EdwardsNew York Court of Appeals · 1897

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Danziger v. GottliebAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1913
  2. Germanow v. Standard Unbreakable Watch Crystals, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1939
  3. Osterhoudt v. Prudential Insurance of AmericaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1913

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API