Legal Opinion · Dissent

James Lee Brent v. State of Mississippi

Court of Appeals of Mississippi

Decided May 22, 2018No. 2016–KA–01351–COAPublished

1Dissent

GRIFFIS, P.J., DISSENTING:

¶ 21. Because I would affirm the conviction under Count III, I respectfully dissent.

¶ 22. There was no direct evidence by a witness who saw the gun. However, "the absence of physical evidence does not negate a conviction where there is testimonial evidence." Sanders v. State , 162 So.3d 868 , 870 (¶ 11) (Miss. Ct. App. 2015). Here, Banks testified he felt something like a gun on the back of his head. He said that he believed Brent possessed a gun because it felt hard against his skull. Banks insisted that it did not feel like a finger. "[O]ne can possess a firearm…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Antonio D. Sanders v. State of MississippiCourt of Appeals of Mississippi · 2015
  2. Johnson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Mississippi · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API