Legal Opinion · Dissent

State v. Adler

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided June 13, 1996No. 1 CA-CR 95-0166Published

1DissentGrant, Presiding Judge

I respectfully dissent from the majority in this instance because I believe that the trial court was mistaken in the two main areas of its decision. The delay in holding the revocation was unreasonable and it resulted in prejudice to Defendant.

Reasonableness of the Delay

Notwithstanding the flexibility inherent in due process, under the facts of this ease, I cannot say the question of Defendant’s probation violations was promptly resolved. Nor can I say the revocation proceedings were held “reasonably soon” after the probation violations occurred. The state claims it could not have proceeded…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Carchman v. NashSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. State v. FlemmingArizona Supreme Court · 1995
  3. State v. BlyArizona Supreme Court · 1978
  4. State v. LeeCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1976
  5. Padilla v. SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA, ETC.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1982

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API