Legal Opinion
Darby v. Southern Ry. Co.
Supreme Court of South Carolina
Decided July 17, 1940No. 15129PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the Court was delivered by
Mr. J. Strom Thurmond, Acting Associate Justice.
This is an appeal from an order of his Honor, Judge Arthur D. Gaston, refusing to grant an order of mandamus against the Southern Railway Company, requiring it to restore trains Nos. 117 and 118 as regular, daily passenger trains, between Rock Hill and Kingville, South Carolina, instead of the mixed passenger and freight train which had been substituted therefor, operating daily except Sundays. The facts are fully set forth in Judge Gaston’s order, which will be reported herewith.
The appellants contend…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Missouri Pacific Railway Co. v. Kansas Ex Rel. Railroad CommissionersSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
- People ex rel. Cantrell v. St. Louis, Alton & Terre Haute RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1898
- Columbia Gaslight Co. v. Mobley, TreasSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1927
- Blease v. Charleston & W. C. Railway Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1928
- City of Columbia v. PearmanSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1936
3Cited by7 opinions
- Atlantic Coast Line R. Co. v. Public Service CommissionDistrict Court, E.D. South Carolina · 1948
- Southern Ry. Co. v. Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1940
- City of Columbia v. South Carolina Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1963
- Hiers v. South Carolina Power Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1941
- Piedmont & Northern Railway Co. v. ScottSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1943
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.