Legal Opinion

Thorworth v. Blanchard

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided June 14, 1913PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Assumpsit. Heard in vacation after the September Term, 1912, Washington County, before Stanton, Superior Judge, on demurrer to the declaration. Demurrer sustained pro forma, and the declaration adjudged insufficient. The defendant excepted. The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the CourtWatson, J.

On application of the plaintiff this case was heard and determined on demurrer to the amended declaration, by a superior judge at chambers, in vacation. The record states that, "To expedite matters and prevent delay the undersigned superior judge, at the request of the plantiff’s counsel, but against the objection and protest of defendant’s counsel, sustained the demurrer pro forma and adjudged the declaration insufficient.” To this ruling*the plaintiff excepted. Thereon the case ivas passed to this Court, under the statute, before final judgment.

The defendant moves that the exceptions be…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Wisconsin Industrial School for Girls v. Clark CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1899
  2. Brewster v. HartleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1869
  3. Foster's Exrs. v. DickersonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1891
  4. Kalb v. German Savings & Loan SocietyWashington Supreme Court · 1901
  5. State v. BlairSupreme Court of Vermont · 1880

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Platt v. ShieldsSupreme Court of Vermont · 1923
  2. Labor, B.N.F. v. CarpenterSupreme Court of Vermont · 1930
  3. Drown v. OderkirkSupreme Court of Vermont · 1915
  4. Saund v. SaundSupreme Court of Vermont · 1927
  5. Bancroft's Administratrix v. CoteSupreme Court of Vermont · 1916

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API