Holloway & Son Construction Co. v. Mattingly Bridge Co.
Kentucky Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
STERNBERG, Justice.
This litigation grew out of a contract for highway construction. For convenience, we will refer to Holloway & Son Construction Company, Inc., as “Holloway,” to Mattingly Bridge Company, Inc., as “Mattingly,” and *569to the Commonwealth of Kentucky, Department of Transportation, Bureau of Highways, as “Department.”
In January, 1971, Holloway entered into a contract with the Department for the construction of an 8-mile section of the Bowling Green-Somerset Parkway. On February 9, 1971, Holloway entered into two contracts with Mattingly for the bridge and concrete structures. The…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- City of Princeton v. Princeton Electric Light & Power Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1915
- Thompson v. FairleighCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1945
- Commonwealth, Department of Highways v. L. G. Wasson Coal Mining Corp.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1962
- Kentucky Utilities Co. v. Carlisle Ice Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1939
3Cited by4 opinions
- Mattingly Bridge Co. v. Holloway & Son Construction Co.Kentucky Supreme Court · 1985
- Apex Contracting, Inc. v. William Robinson Construction Co.Kentucky Supreme Court · 1979
- Burkesville Hardwoods, LLC v. CoomerDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2020
- Mattingly Bridge Co. v. Holloway & Son Construction Co.Kentucky Supreme Court · 1985