Legal Opinion

Holloway & Son Construction Co. v. Mattingly Bridge Co.

Kentucky Supreme Court

Decided May 1, 1979PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STERNBERG, Justice.

This litigation grew out of a contract for highway construction. For convenience, we will refer to Holloway & Son Construction Company, Inc., as “Holloway,” to Mattingly Bridge Company, Inc., as “Mattingly,” and *569to the Commonwealth of Kentucky, Department of Transportation, Bureau of Highways, as “Department.”

In January, 1971, Holloway entered into a contract with the Department for the construction of an 8-mile section of the Bowling Green-Somerset Parkway. On February 9, 1971, Holloway entered into two contracts with Mattingly for the bridge and concrete structures. The…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. City of Princeton v. Princeton Electric Light & Power Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1915
  2. Thompson v. FairleighCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1945
  3. Commonwealth, Department of Highways v. L. G. Wasson Coal Mining Corp.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1962
  4. Kentucky Utilities Co. v. Carlisle Ice Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1939

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Mattingly Bridge Co. v. Holloway & Son Construction Co.Kentucky Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Apex Contracting, Inc. v. William Robinson Construction Co.Kentucky Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Burkesville Hardwoods, LLC v. CoomerDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2020
  4. Mattingly Bridge Co. v. Holloway & Son Construction Co.Kentucky Supreme Court · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API