Legal Opinion
Farris Co. v. the Wm. Schludersberg, T. J. Kurdle
Supreme Court of Florida
Decided May 17, 1940PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
On Petition for Rehearing
2Per curiam
On petition for rehearing, it is urged that we did not give sufficient consideration to the validity and effect of a certain C. A. F. contract which was a very material element in the cause. In other words, it is contended that the carload of boned beef which was the subject matter of this litigation was shipped from Jacksonville to Baltimore under C. A. F. contract, meaning cost and freight allowed to point of destination, being the equivalent F. O. B. from point of origin and that when so shipped the responsibility of the shipper ceases when the goods are delivered…
3Cited by4 opinions
- Sperry Rand Corporation v. Industrial Supply Corporation, Industrial Supply Corporation v. Sperry Rand CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1964
- Pierce v. HelzNew York Supreme Court · 1970
- Jacobson v. Neuensorger Korbwaren-Industrie Friedrich Kretz, K.-G.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1959
- Ladex Corp. v. Transportes Aereos NacionalesDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985