The Dow Chemical Company, Libelant-Appellee and Cross v. The Barge Um-23b, Its Tackle, Apparel, Etc., and the Barge Bc-598, Its Tackle, Apparel, Etc., in Rem, and Bartlett & Company, Missouri River Barge Lines, Inc., Cargo Carriers, Inc., Upper Mississippi Towing Corporation, and Two Twenty-Eight Terminal Services, Inc., in Personam, Respondents-Respondents Impleader-Cross Cargo Carriers, Inc., Respondent-Third Party v. Two Twenty-Eight Terminal Services, Inc., and Insurance Company of North America, Third Party Defendants-Appellants-Cross
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
424 F.2d 307
The DOW CHEMICAL COMPANY, Libelant-Appellee and Cross Appellant,
v.
The BARGE UM-23B, its tackle, apparel, etc., and the BARGE
BC-598, its tackle, apparel, etc., in rem, and Bartlett &
Company, Missouri River Barge Lines, Inc., Cargo Carriers,
Inc., Upper Mississippi Towing Corporation, and Two
Twenty-Eight Terminal Services, Inc., in personam,
Respondents-Respondents Impleader-Cross Appellees.
CARGO CARRIERS, INC., Respondent-Third Party Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
TWO TWENTY-EIGHT TERMINAL SERVICES, INC., and Insurance
Company of North America, Third Party
Defendants-Appellants-Cross Appellees.
N…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- McAllister v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- Ex Parte Republic of PeruSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Gardner v. Panama RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- The ResoluteSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Leon Akers v. State Marine Lines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1965
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.