Legal Opinion

The Dow Chemical Company, Libelant-Appellee and Cross v. The Barge Um-23b, Its Tackle, Apparel, Etc., and the Barge Bc-598, Its Tackle, Apparel, Etc., in Rem, and Bartlett & Company, Missouri River Barge Lines, Inc., Cargo Carriers, Inc., Upper Mississippi Towing Corporation, and Two Twenty-Eight Terminal Services, Inc., in Personam, Respondents-Respondents Impleader-Cross Cargo Carriers, Inc., Respondent-Third Party v. Two Twenty-Eight Terminal Services, Inc., and Insurance Company of North America, Third Party Defendants-Appellants-Cross

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided April 13, 1970No. 27330_1Published

1Opinion of the Court

424 F.2d 307

The DOW CHEMICAL COMPANY, Libelant-Appellee and Cross Appellant,

v.

The BARGE UM-23B, its tackle, apparel, etc., and the BARGE

BC-598, its tackle, apparel, etc., in rem, and Bartlett &

Company, Missouri River Barge Lines, Inc., Cargo Carriers,

Inc., Upper Mississippi Towing Corporation, and Two

Twenty-Eight Terminal Services, Inc., in personam,

Respondents-Respondents Impleader-Cross Appellees.

CARGO CARRIERS, INC., Respondent-Third Party Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

TWO TWENTY-EIGHT TERMINAL SERVICES, INC., and Insurance

Company of North America, Third Party

Defendants-Appellants-Cross Appellees.

N…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. McAllister v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  2. Ex Parte Republic of PeruSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  3. Gardner v. Panama RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
  4. The ResoluteSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  5. Leon Akers v. State Marine Lines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1965

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API