Dobson v. Central Railroad Co., of New Jersey
New York Supreme Court
Action brought to set aside the award of an arbitrator on the alleged ground that he has erred in his conclusions of law. The defendant demurs, on the ground that the complaint does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action.
1Opinion of the CourtWeight, J.
It appears from the complaint, that, on Hay 19, 1902, the plaintiffs delivered to the defendant, at Laurel T-TiTl., Penn., fifteen cases of velours, in good order, to be transported to New York city. The plaintiffs received a bill of lading for the goods. Eleven of the cases arrived in New York on the following *583Monday, the twenty-first, in good order. The other four cases were delayed, not reaching New York till the following Wednesday, May twenty-third. Two of these cases arrived wet and damaged thereby.
The plaintiffs claiming damages, the matter in controversy was, by mutual consent,…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Vandewater v. MillsSupreme Court of the United States · 1857
- The DelawareSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
- Stewart v. . StoneNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
- Fudickar v. . Guardian Mutual Life Ins. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1875
- Matter of WilkinsNew York Court of Appeals · 1902
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- In re Arbitration Proceeding between Bond & ShubertAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1942