Legal Opinion

Sucrest Corp. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided February 11, 1943No. C. D. 728PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Ekwall, Judge:

These three protests arose from the importation at the port of Philadelphia in August and September 1939, of two cargoes of raw sugar from the Eepublic of Cuba, both of which cargoes were entered in bond for warehousing. All the sugar has long since been withdrawn for consumption. The issue in protest 46411-K is quite different from that in the remaining two protests, but as the three cases were consolidated for trial and were submitted for decision on one stipulation of fact, we shall pass on them in one opinion.

Taking up protest 46411-K first, we find it to be, in terms,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Barney v. RickardSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  2. Central Commodities Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1941

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Stern v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API