Legal Opinion

Glor v. Department of Highway Safety & Motor Vehicles

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided July 26, 2013No. 1D12-5322PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ON MOTION TO ENFORCE THIS COURT’S MANDATE AND FOR A WRIT OF PROHIBITION

2Per curiam

DENIED. See Dodson v. Dep’t of Highway Safety & Motor Vehicles, 120 So.3d 69 (Fla. 1st DCA 2013) (opinion on motion to enforce this court’s mandate). This case is remanded to the circuit court whereupon by either party’s filing of a proper motion requesting same, the circuit court shall remand to the Department for a new hearing that meets the essential requirements of the law. See Broward County v. G.B.V Int’l Ltd., 787 So.2d 838, 843-44 (Fla.2001); See also Clay County v. Kendale Land Dev., Inc., 969 So.2d 1177, 1180-81…

3Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Broward County v. GBV Intern., Ltd.Supreme Court of Florida · 2001
  2. Clay County v. KENDALE LAND DEVELOPMENTDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2007

4Cited by3 opinions

  1. Department of Highway Safety & Motor Vehicles v. FutchDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2014
  2. Johnson v. Monsanto Co.California Court of Appeal · 2020
  3. Johnson v. Monsanto CompanyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API