Legal Opinion · Dissent

Olaimey v. Turk

Court of Appeals of Arkansas

Decided December 12, 1990No. CA 89-502Published

1DissentMelvin Mayfield, Judge

The majority of the court has today ordered the appellant to pay appellee the sum of $1,025.00 for the services rendered by her attorney in the appeal of this case. I dissent for two reasons.

First, I dissent because appellee’s motion contains no statement of authority in support of her request for attorney’s fee, and makes no attempt to state any reason why the request should be granted. In Bailey v. Montgomery, 31 Ark. App. 1, 786 S.W.2d 594 (1990), this court stated: “As a general rule, attorney’s fees are not allowed in Arkansas unless expressly authorized by statute.” We cited the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Damron v. University Estates, Phase II, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1988
  2. Bailey v. MontgomeryCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API