Legal Opinion

Allied Building Products Corp. v. Clarke

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 18, 1992PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Supreme Court properly exercised its discretion in denying defendant’s motion to vacate the default judgment because defendant Karen E. Clarke failed to establish a reasonable excuse for her failure to appear at trial (see, CPLR 5015 [a] [1]; Passalacqua v Banat, 103 AD2d 769). Defendant’s failure to communicate or cooperate with her attorney does not excuse her default (see, Candeloro v Candeloro, 133 AD2d 731; Kirkman/3hree, Inc. v Priority AMC/Jeep, 94 AD2d 870), particularly when the lack of communication was largely due to defendant’s…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Passalacqua v. BanatAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
  2. Candeloro v. CandeloroAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
  3. Kirkman/3hree, Inc. v. Priority AMC/Jeep, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
  4. Personnel Systems International, Inc. v. Clifford R. Gray, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
  5. Cherney v. De RosaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Fujah v. V-M Auto Refinishing Corp.New York Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Hrynyk v. Glidden Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API