Legal Opinion

Doolen v. Hulsey

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided January 17, 1917No. 1090PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The appellants Milam and Doolen, together with appellee Mowrey were the owners of the south one-half of section 502, block H. W. N.W. Railway Company, in Childress county, Tex., subject to a deed of trust to secure the payment of a note for $2,750, in favor of the Reynolds Mortgage Company, which note and deed of trust had been executed by their vendor and payment assumed by the said Milam, Doolen, and Mowrey, in the deed of conveyance to them. Milam, Doolen, and Mowrey conveyed the land to W. A. Cantrell, in consideration of his assumption of the note to the Reynolds Mortgage Company, the…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. George v. HesseTexas Supreme Court · 1906
  2. J. M. Hamilton & Co. v. PrescottTexas Supreme Court · 1889
  3. Baldwin v. RootTexas Supreme Court · 1897
  4. Hampshire v. GreevesTexas Supreme Court · 1912
  5. Andrews v. JacksonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1897

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Johnson v. Sovereign Camp Woodmen of the WorldCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1935
  2. J. S. Curtiss & Co. v. WhiteCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1935
  3. J. S. Curtiss & Co. v. WhiteCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1935
  4. Schilder v. Fort Worth National Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1935
  5. Yates v. BainCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API