Legal Opinion

State v. Rafal

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided April 14, 1975No. C 74-04-1229 CrPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSchwab, C.J.

Defendant was convicted of criminal activity in drugs — possession of marihuana in a quantity exceeding one ounce — a felony or misdemeanor under ORS 167.207(2). It is conceded that there was evidence from which the jury could have found that defendant possessed less than one ounce of marihuana, a violation under ORS 167.207(3). At trial defendant requested that the jury be instructed on the elements of the violation of possession of less than one ounce. The trial court refused to do so, reasoning it could only instruct on lesser included crimes, not lesser included violations. We hold this…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. WelchOregon Supreme Court · 1973
  2. State v. IrvingOregon Supreme Court · 1974

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Robinson v. Omark Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1980
  2. State v. MinkCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1977
  3. Robinson v. Omark Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1980
  4. State v. JaloCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1976
  5. State v. JaloCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API