Naperskie v. Trevillion
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the CourtGriffin Smith, C. J.
Appellant contends that a judgment for $1,194.36 rendered by default and without proof, is erroneous. We have the same view.
Appellant’s wife purchased real property in Nevada county, Arkansas, upon which were remnants of an old sawmill. A boiler and engines were set in concrete. The mill had been owned by H. C. Trevillion, who upon ascertaining that the salvage had been sold for $100 to Dee Curtis, junk dealer of Texarkana, sued L. J. Naperskie in a justice of the peace court at Prescott for an amount equal to that received by Naperskie from Curtis. When the controversy arose the payment made…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Anheuser-Busch, Inc. v. ManionSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1937
- Greer v. NewbillSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1909
- Derrick v. ColeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1895
- Cox Investment Co. v. Major Stave Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1917
- Marshall v. Green Exr.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1866
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Kohlenberger, Inc. v. Tyson's Foods, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1974
- Miller County v. BeasleySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1941
- Dixie Auto Ins. Co. v. GoudySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1964
- Kohlenberger, Inc. v. Tyson's Foods, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1974
- Rountree v. Farmers Cotton Oil Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1944