Legal Opinion

Naperskie v. Trevillion

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided June 16, 1941No. 4-6399PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGriffin Smith, C. J.

Appellant contends that a judgment for $1,194.36 rendered by default and without proof, is erroneous. We have the same view.

Appellant’s wife purchased real property in Nevada county, Arkansas, upon which were remnants of an old sawmill. A boiler and engines were set in concrete. The mill had been owned by H. C. Trevillion, who upon ascertaining that the salvage had been sold for $100 to Dee Curtis, junk dealer of Texarkana, sued L. J. Naperskie in a justice of the peace court at Prescott for an amount equal to that received by Naperskie from Curtis. When the controversy arose the payment made…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Anheuser-Busch, Inc. v. ManionSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1937
  2. Greer v. NewbillSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1909
  3. Derrick v. ColeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1895
  4. Cox Investment Co. v. Major Stave Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1917
  5. Marshall v. Green Exr.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1866

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Kohlenberger, Inc. v. Tyson's Foods, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1974
  2. Miller County v. BeasleySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1941
  3. Dixie Auto Ins. Co. v. GoudySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1964
  4. Kohlenberger, Inc. v. Tyson's Foods, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1974
  5. Rountree v. Farmers Cotton Oil Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1944

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API