Legal Opinion

Maryland Attorney General Opinion 96 OAG 128

Maryland Attorney General Reports

Decided December 21, 2011No. 96 OAG 128Published

1Opinion of the Court

128 [96 Op. Att’y CRIMINAL LAW VEHICULAR MANSLAUGHTER – COMPARISON OF “GROSS NEGLIGENCE” THAT IS AN ELEMENT OF VIOLATION OF OFFENSE DEFINED IN CRIMINAL LAW ARTICLE §2-209 WITH “CRIMINAL NEGLIGENCE” THAT IS AN ELEMENT OF THE OFFENSE DEFINED IN CRIMINAL LAW ARTICLE §2-210 December 21, 2011 The Honorable Joseph I. Cassilly State’s Attorney for Harford County You have asked for our opinion on two criminal statutes that establish offenses for homicide resulting from the negligent operation of a vehicle or vessel. In particular, you ask whether there is any distinction between the standards of…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Liparota v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. State v. AlbrechtCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1994
  3. United States v. Gomez-LeonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
  4. State v. GibsonCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1968
  5. Dishman v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1998

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API