Goeke v. Branch
Supreme Court of the United States
1Per curiam
In this case, the Eighth Circuit granted habeas relief on the ground that it is a violation of Fourteenth Amendment due process for a state appellate court to dismiss the appeal of a recaptured fugitive where there is no demonstrated ad verse effect on the appellate process. The court declined to consider whether application of its ruling in respondent’s case would violate the principle of Teague v. Lane, 489 U. S. 288 (1989) (plurality opinion), concluding the State had waived that argument. The State raised the Teague bar, and application of the Eighth Circuit’s novel rule violates Teague’s…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Teague v. LaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Evitts v. LuceySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Godinez v. MoranSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Saffle v. ParksSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by120 opinions
- Smith v. RobbinsSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Theodore J. Lyons v. Clarice StovallCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999
- Commonwealth v. CunninghamSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
- Steven Keith Hatch v. State of OklahomaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
- Calvin JONES, Petitioner-Appellant, v. A.A. GOMEZ, Warden, and John K. Van De Kamp, Respondents-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
115 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.