Watson v. United States
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
1Concurring in part, dissenting in partSchwelb, Senior Judge
De minimis non curat lex1
I
In my opinion, Watson’s conduct as found by the judge — -as distinguished from the scenario described by the wife, but rejected by the court as unproved — was, at most, a de minimis and inconsequential violation of the assault statute. Surely husbands, wives, lovers and friends have snatched or grabbed objects from each other on innumerable occasions without the notion occurring to anyone that a crime has been committed or that the criminal justice system should become involved. Cf. State v. Cabana, 315 N.J.Super. 84, 716 A.2d 576, 578 (1997), aff’d, 318 N.J.Super.…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- United States National Bank v. Independent Insurance Agents of America, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- State v. HoffmanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1997
- Beausoliel v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1939
- Comber v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990
- Allen v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1992
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.