Legal Opinion
Raishevich v. Foster
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided November 10, 1999No. 95 Civ. 3153(WCC)PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
WILLIAM C. CONNER, Senior District Judge.
On May 26 and June 1, 1998, this Court conducted a bench trial on the issue of damages in this civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Defendant conceded liability. On July 17,1998, this Court issued an Opinion and Order finding that plaintiff Boris Raishevich (“Raishevich”) was entitled to receive $24,000 in compensatory damages for defendant’s destruction of certain photographic transparencies. See Raishevich v. Foster; 9 F.Supp.2d 415 (S.D.N.Y.1998). Judgment was entered in the amount of $24,000 in favor of Raishe-vich on August…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Farrar v. HobbySupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Texas State Teachers Ass'n v. Garland Independent School DistrictSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Newman v. Piggie Park Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Rhodes v. StewartSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Sternberg v. FletcherCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Marisol A. Ex Rel. Forbes v. GiulianiDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2000
- Tlacoapa v. CarregalDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2005
- Boris Raishevich v. Charles Foster, Agent or Employee of the Nys PoliceCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001