Legal Opinion
Deal Ex Rel. Deal v. Hamilton County Dept. of Educ.
District Court, E.D. Tennessee
Decided March 4, 2003No. 2:01-cv-00295PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
EDGAR, Chief Judge.
Plaintiffs Maureen and Phillip Deal are the parents of Zachary Deal (“Zachary”), a child diagnosed with autism spectrum disorder. 1 Zachary and his parents reside in Hamilton County, Tennessee, and Zachary attended public school in the Hamilton County school system. Maureen and Phillip Deal (the “Deals”) bring this action on behalf of Zachary under the Individuals With Disabilities Act (“IDEA”), 20 U.S.C. §§ 1400 — 1420. The case comes before this Court on appeal from a decision by an Administrative Law Judge (“ALJ”) pursuant to 20 U.S.C. § 1415 § (i)(2).…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- San Antonio Independent School District v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Board of Education of the Hendrick Hudson Central School District v. Rowley Ex Rel. RowleySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Honig v. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- School Committee of the Town of Burlington v. Department of EducationSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Florence County School District Four v. Carter Ex Rel. CarterSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Loren F. Ex Rel. Fisher v. Atlanta Independent School SystemCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2003
- Hoover City Board of Education, The v. LeventryDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 2019