Legal Opinion

Rose v. Brickhouse

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided January 19, 1931PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

iSmith, J.

Appellant, who is a citizen and taxpayer of Pulaski County, seeks by this suit to enjoin appellee from collecting a salary from. Pulaski County, which was being paid him for certain services rendered the county and probate judge of that county. The cause was heard in the court 'below on the stipulation of opposing counsel, which recited the character of service rendered, and from which we copy as follows:

“W. P. Sibeck, the county and probate judge of Pulaski County, during the regular 1929 session of the levying court, commonly known as the quorum court; ’ ’ made representations of…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. State v. MartinSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1895
  2. Nixon v. AllenSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1921
  3. Farrell v. OliverSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1921
  4. Marshall v. HollandSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1925
  5. Merwin v. FussellSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1910

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Parker v. LawsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1970
  2. Jansen v. BlissenbachSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1949
  3. Deaderick, Mayor v. ParkerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1947
  4. Cooper v. HensleeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1975
  5. Burrow, County Judge v. FloydSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1936

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API