Legal Opinion

Kennedy v. Jackson Architectural Iron Works

The Superior Court of the City of New York and Buffalo

Decided May 6, 1895PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from jury term. Action by Martin Kennedy against the Jackson Architectural Iron Works for personal injuries. From a judgment dismissing the complaint, plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtBeekman, J.

At the time of the injury complained of, the plaintiff was in the employment of the defendant, who was engaged in constructing the iron work of a building then in course of erection, The plaintiff was one of a gang of four men, who were in charge of a foreman, all of whom were also in the employment of the defendant. In order to perform the work upon which they were engaged, the use of a derrick was necessary. Such a derrick was supplied by the defendant. There is no evidence in the case to show that it was not a safe and proper appliance for the purposes for which it was intended to be used,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Burke v. . WitherbeeNew York Court of Appeals · 1885
  2. Cregan v. . MarstonNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
  3. Stringham v. . HiltonNew York Court of Appeals · 1888
  4. Probst v. . DelamaterNew York Court of Appeals · 1885
  5. Gottlieb v. . N.Y., L.E. W.R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1885

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Divver v. HallAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1897
  2. Yaw v. WhitmoreAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1899
  3. Dougherty v. MillikenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1898
  4. Hatton v. Hilton Bridge Construction Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1899
  5. Dougherty v. MillikenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1898

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API