Legal Opinion

Radick v. Underwriters at Lloyd's, London

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided June 24, 1943No. 8203PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EVANS, Circuit Judge.

This action, on an insurance policy issued by defendant, was dismissed because» the cause of action was barred by a policy limitation period of twelve months within-which plaintiffs were required to institute suit against defendant. For plaintiffs, it is argued that this limitation provision was-tolled by the absence of the defendant from the State of Ohio, where the cause-of action arose.

Plaintiffs were injured on May 10, 1939, while riding on a ferris wheel in an amusement park in Lorain, Ohio. They sued the owners of the park (whom defendant had insured), and on…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Riddlesbarger v. Hartford InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
  2. Barthelmas v. Fidelity-Phenix Fire Ins.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1939

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Gifford v. Travelers Protective Ass'n of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1946
  2. Jose Estevez v. Horace A. Nabers, Acting Officer in Charge, New Orleans Office Immigration& Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1955
  3. American Renaissance Lines, Inc. v. Saxis Steamship Co., and Multifacs International Traders, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1974
  4. Clouatre v. Houston Fire & Casualty Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1956
  5. Clouatre v. Houston Fire & Casualty CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1956

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API