Legal Opinion

Kopping v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 11, 2006No. C051885PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

ROBIE, Acting P. J.

The question here is whether the presumption established by subdivision (b) of Labor Code 1 section 4664 (section 4664(b)) is conclusive or rebuttable. That statute, which is one of the workers’ compensation statutes enacted in 2004 to govern apportionment of permanent disability (Stats. 2004, ch. 34, § 35), 2 provides that “[i]f the applicant has received a prior award of permanent disability, it shall be conclusively presumed that the prior permanent disability exists at the time of any subsequent industrial injury. This presumption is a presumption affecting the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. California Manufacturers Ass'n v. Public Utilities CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Fuentes v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  3. State Compensation Insurance Fund v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
  4. Chatham v. MillsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
  5. Weber v. County of Santa BarbaraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Brodie v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Benson v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
  3. Chang v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
  4. Foster v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
  5. Dep't of Corr. & Rehab. v. Workers' Comp. Appeals Bd., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API