Legal Opinion

Urhausen v. City of Eugene

Oregon Tax Court

Decided July 6, 2006No. TC 4692PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

HENRY C. BREITHAUPT, Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

This matter is before the court on stipulated facts and cross motions for summary judgment. Petitioners maintain that 93% of the proceeds of a voter approved levy of the City of Eugene (the city) must be accounted for in the “public school funding” category of Article XI, section lib, of the Oregon Constitution (Measure 5), which was added to the constitution by initiative. Respondent argues that all proceeds of the levy were, and are, properly accounted for in the “other government” category of Measure 5. The difference in categorization is important…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Shilo Inn Portland/205, LLC v. Multnomah CountyOregon Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Glenn v. Morrow County Unified Recreation DistrictOregon Tax Court · 1998

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Urhausen v. City of EugeneOregon Supreme Court · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API