Greer v. National Grid
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
On a motion to dismiss pursuant to CFLR 3211 (a) (7) for failure to state a cause of action, the court must accept the facts alleged in the pleading as true, accord the plaintiff the benefit of every possible inference, and determine only whether the facts as alleged fit within any cognizable legal theory (see Goshen v Mutual Life Ins. Co. of N.Y., 98 NY2d 314, 326 [2002]; *1060Leon v Martinez, 84 NY2d 83, 87 [1994]; Prestige Caterers, Inc. v Siegel, 88 AD3d 679 [2011]; Peery v United Capital Corp., 84 AD3d 1201 [2011]). Here, the complaint sufficiently states all of the necessary elements of a…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Leon v. MartinezNew York Court of Appeals · 1994
- Goshen v. Mutual Life InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 2002
- Cantalino v. DannerNew York Court of Appeals · 2001
- Ramos v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
- Lupski v. County of NassauAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.