Rosenstein v. Raticoff
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Per curiam
While we agree with each of the abstract legal propositions advanced by appellant, we find that we are unable to apply them in the instant appeal and unable to determine that reversible error has been committed. The reason is that we have not been furnished with the record, or enough of it, whereby we can conclusively and definitively determine the whole factual basis for the trial court decisions. The judgment comes, of course, with a presumption of correctness and it is the duty of appellant to demonstrate error by furnishing the basis upon which the rulings were made in order that we may…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Brown v. HouseholderDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1961
- Warriner v. Doug Tower, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1965
- Belflower v. RisherDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1969
3Cited by5 opinions
- Strauser v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1978
- Johnson & Panico, P. A. v. CouchDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1977
- Perry v. PerryDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1974
- Fernandez-Silva v. LangDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1986
- State v. SulikowskiDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1977