Legal Opinion

Pfenning v. Liberty Life Assurance Co.

District Court, S.D. Ohio

Decided June 26, 2017No. Case No. 3:14-cv-471PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

THOMAS M. ROSE, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

*827Having prevailed in this Court on their argument that California law provided for a deferential standard of review of non-residents, on appeal Defendant Liberty Life Assurance Company of Boston agreed with Plaintiff Douglas Pfenning that a de novo standard applied. The United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit remanded the case for an opinion as to who would prevail under a de novo review.

Plaintiff Douglas Pfenning brought this action under § 502(a)(1)(B) of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1972, 29 U.S.C. § 1132(a)(1)(B),…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Bob G. Wilkins v. Baptist Healthcare System, Inc. Life Insurance Company of North AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1998
  3. Linda Gail Calvert v. Firstar Finance, Inc., F/k/a Star Bank Corporation, and Liberty Life Assurance Company of BostonCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2005
  4. Patricia Elliott v. Metropolitan Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006
  5. Bruce Osborne v. Hartford Life and Accident Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Mayer v. Ringler Associates Inc. and Affiliates Long Term Disability PlanDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API