People v. Goldberg

The defendant, Arthur Goldberg, was arrested charged with robbery armed, with intent, if resisted, to kill and maim. On trial he was convicted, and brings error. He claims tbe trial court erred in charging the offense was established, and the only question was the claimed participation of defendant, and in giving undue prominence to the people’s witnesses. He claims the argument of the prosecuting attorney was prejudicial, and the court erred in failing to properly charge as to the weight to be given defendant’s testimony, and in denying defendant’s motion for a new trial.

The question raised…